Category Archives: 9-9:50am Panel Session 1

“I, Too, Am A Student”: Narrations Related to Minoritized Experiences Within a Range of Educational Spaces

There are five presenters in the panel.

Zoom Link: https://buffalo.zoom.us/j/99163494488?pwd=cnVZaTJnOGEyZGNJTVFZZnRGSlQ5Zz09

Title: Am I Really Your Dearly Beloved Daughter? Chinese Rural College and Graduate Women Reflect on their Experiences of Pursuing Higher Education Degrees in China
Presenter: Ying Li

Title: “Lost in the Sauce”: NCAA DI Women’s Basketball as a Vehicle for Social Mobility
Presenter: Iman Lathan

Title: “How Can I Avoid Prison?”: Positive Outcomes of Alternative Sentencing Programs as narrated by Judges, Defense Attorneys & Social Workers: Reflections of Juvenile Court Personnel.
Presenter: Emmanuel Akinyele

Title: Count me in: A reflective narrative of the first generation immigrant students’ high school to college pipeline
Presenter: Kavitha Muralidhar

Title: Latinx Undergraduates: The Narrated Effects of Family on Student Experiences and Perseverance at a Research I University
Presenter: Chelsea Rodriguez 

Norms and Bystander Intervention Training (NAB IT!) for Bullying and Sexual Harrasment Prevention in High School

Julianna Casella,  Maggie Manges, Kay Huang,  Dylan Harrison, Lucia Sun  (Counseling, School, and Educational Psychology)

Zoom Link https://buffalo.zoom.us/j/97400885655?pwd=V3gzcjVqQytTbktXaW12ajcvZVdOUT09

The proposed panel will include three papers focused on different aspects of a study conducted by the Alberti Center for Bullying Abuse Prevention evaluating the Norms and Bystander Intervention Training (NAB IT!), which aims to prevent bullying and sexual harrassment in high schools students.

The first paper examines the impact of a social norms campaign on personal normative attitudes and perceived peer norms, as well as the relationship between personal norms, perceived peer norms, and perpetration (i.e., bullying, cyberbullying, sexual harassment, and homophobic name calling). Correlation analyses reveal that perpetration variables at pre- and post-test are related to one another, and to social norms. Wilcoxen Signed Ranks Tests indicate that personal norms at pre- and post-test are significantly different, with post-test scores being more prosocial (Z = -2.30, p = .022), and with personal norms being more prosocial than perceived peer norms at pre-test (Z = -6.00, p = .000) and post-test (Z = -5.91, p = .000). Item-level differences will be highlighted in the context of the social norms campaign. Implications for the NAB IT! campaign and the utility of social norms campaigns broadly to address perpetration in high schools will be discussed.

The second paper will further examine the impact of a social norms campaign to target bullying and sexual harrassment in high schools by disscusing student and faculty’s impressions of the campaign. Students and faculty participated in focus groups asking about their thoughts, opinions and suggestions about the social norms campaign, which were then coded for overarching themes across participants. Themes from the student focus groups indicated positive feelings about the appearance, messages, and locations of the posters. Students also raised concerns about exposure and awareness to the campaign, due to remote schooling, as well as believability of the messages on the poster. The faculty focus groups indicate similar positive feelings about the poster and campaign design and message, as well as similar concerns about impact due to remote learning.  Teachers also discussed the interactions they had with students about the campaign, as well as suggested improvements. These themes will be discussed in further detail, highlighting implications for the NAB IT! campaign and usability of social norm campaigns in high schools.

The third paper explores the impact of the Bystander Intervention Training component of NAB IT! on high school student leaders  knowledge, attitudes, and self-reported bystander intervention behaviors. The study also examines students  and faculty s reactions and feedback to the training by participating in focus groups, which were then coded for broad themes across participants.